Evidence-first
Evidence-first reporting that makes identity risk easier to explain and prioritise.
For CISOs
When the board asks about identity risk,
When the board asks about identity risk,
you need a clear answer.
IdentityFirst helps you give one.
IdentityFirst MRI gives you a read-only view of the accounts, access, and sign-in patterns that shape your risk. You get a practical summary, the highest-priority issues, and a representative report structure you can use to frame a board or MSP conversation without overstating live tenant proof.
MRI is the only public GA surface • read-only • no agents
Why this lands with CISOs
Clear enough for the board, narrow enough to trust.
Evidence-first identity security that starts read-only and keeps humans in control.
Read-only day one
Read-only on day one so teams can start without changing production systems.
Human-approved writes
Any write path stays human-approved. IdentityFirst does not claim autonomous action.
Public messaging stays within current product boundaries and explicitly published connector status.
You may already have tools. You still may not have a clean answer.
Many security teams already have directory tools, access tools, and monitoring. The gap is not technology. The gap is a simple, reliable answer to questions like: who still has access, what is exposed, and what should be fixed first.
IdentityFirst reads the evidence across those systems and turns it into one plain-English MRI view. You can use it for board reporting, risk discussions, and remediation planning without rebuilding the story every time, while keeping broader rollout surfaces clearly separate.
Questions this helps you answer:
- Which accounts still have access after people have moved role or left?
- If one account is compromised, what could an attacker reach next in the current assessment scope?
- Which users have more access than they really need?
- Can we show the board and auditors that access is reviewed and controlled?
What you get
A practical starting point for board reporting, risk review, and remediation planning.
Simple risk summary
A short summary that shows where risk sits, what is driving it, and what should be fixed first.
What exposure could spread
An assessment-level view of how far a compromised account could go, so you can focus on the right controls first. Fuller identity graph analysis sits in higher-tier rollout paths.
Practical next steps
Findings ordered by what will reduce risk fastest, not by generic severity alone.
Board-ready report
A representative MRI board report your board can read quickly without losing the detail your team needs.
Audit-supporting findings
Clear findings and framework cross-references that reduce manual audit preparation, while leaving formal audit interpretation with your auditors.
Read-only start
We start by reading what is already there. That keeps the first step simple and low risk.
Framework cross-references included
Every finding is cross-referenced to relevant control areas across six major compliance frameworks. This reduces manual compilation for audit preparation, though your auditors will still apply their own professional interpretation to the results.
Findings cross-referenced to framework controls
ISO 27001
SOC 2 Type II
NIST CSF
CIS Controls
DORA
NIS2
Start with a CISO briefing
30 minutes. We show the kind of issues the platform finds and how you would use the results in practice.