Skip to main content
Public website
Public website surface Marketing and explanation content. This is not the canonical authenticated runtime.
Canonical runtime: app.identityfirst.net
Security Overview

EV-signed artefacts. RS256 licence validation. Fail-closed by design.

IdentityFirst is built on a single, auditable codebase with four capability tiers activated only through EV-signed manifests. Every action is logged. Every boundary is enforced. Every failure closes down rather than opens up.

Curated

This page is a diligence-ready architecture summary. Pair it with runtime-backed status and attestation surfaces where those are available in scope.

Platform architecture overview

One codebase. Four licensed tiers. Capability boundaries enforced by cryptography, not configuration.

Single-codebase architecture

  • All four product tiers (MRI, Core, Enhanced, AISF) are implemented in one unified codebase — no forks, no separate code paths, no configuration-only tier switches.
  • Capabilities are activated by EV code-signed manifests validated via RS256 JWT licence tokens. A lower tier can never silently gain access to a higher-tier capability.
  • Shared primitives — identity graph, evidence engine, policy fabric, orchestration layer, audit substrate — are reusable across all tiers.
  • The platform is modular. Each capability declares its tier availability, signature reference, dependencies, and evidence outputs in its manifest.

Four-tier capability model

IdentityFirst MRI (GA now)

  • Read-only identity discovery across agreed launch-core sources, with additional connectors only where maturity and written scope support them
  • Risk scoring with impact estimation
  • Orphan account enumeration and privilege mapping
  • Kerberoastable SPN detection
  • Compliance framework cross-referencing (ISO 27001, SOC 2, NIST CSF, CIS Controls, DORA, NIS2)
  • Board-ready PDF report and technical dossier
  • Remediation priority list
  • HMAC-SHA256 tamper-evident audit chain

IdentityFirst Core (Controlled rollout)

  • Everything in MRI
  • Scheduled reassessment and drift review
  • Identity graph direction (Substantia data plane)
  • Governed write-capable operating model only where human approval, entitlement, and written scope are in place
  • Licence-gated governed workflow direction, not a default public MRI promise

IdentityFirst Enhanced (Private beta)

  • Everything in Core
  • Access review workflows under beta validation
  • JIT privileged access workflows under beta validation
  • SoD policy controls under beta validation
  • Webhook and SIEM integration surfaces where explicitly scoped
  • Scheduled policy-control concepts under test
  • AI-assisted analysis and operator support under beta validation

IdentityFirst AISF (Private beta)

  • Everything in Enhanced
  • Human-approved multi-step action workflows under controlled beta conditions
  • Governance-aware workflow controls under controlled beta conditions
  • AI-assisted modelling and response concepts under roadmap and beta control
  • Cross-platform identity graph direction
  • Cryptographic readiness assessment (migration planning only)

Tier boundaries are hard security boundaries enforced by EV-signed manifests. Violation causes a fail-closed drop to MRI-only mode, not a silent degradation.

Multi-tenant isolation

  • Per-tenant API keys with constant-time comparison. No shared credentials between tenants.
  • TenantEnforcementMiddleware validates tenant identity on every inbound request; cross-tenant data access is architecturally rejected.
  • All data is tagged with a verified tenant identifier before persistence. Mixed writes are rejected at the service layer.
  • Tenant suspension is available as an immediate operator action, logged in the HMAC-SHA256 tamper-evident audit chain.

EV code signing certificate as root of trust

The IdentityFirst EV Code Signing certificate is the cryptographic root of trust for the entire platform. No unsigned artefact can activate any capability.

What is signed

  • All licence manifests, capability manifests, policy bundles, and module activation descriptors must be digitally signed using the EV certificate.
  • Windows PE binaries are signed with signtool using RFC 3161 timestamps.
  • NuGet packages are signed with dotnet nuget sign.
  • SHA256 checksums are generated for every release artefact and included in the release manifest.

Three-gate module loading

  • A module may only load if: (1) its capability ID appears in a valid EV-signed manifest; (2) the active licence tier authorises it; and (3) its integrity hash matches the signed descriptor.
  • All three gates must pass. Failure in any gate causes a fail-closed drop to MRI-only mode.
  • Every activation event is logged with: capability ID, tier, signature result, module hash, and policy decision.
  • There are no debug switches to disable signature verification. The platform assumes adversarial conditions.

Key custody

  • The EV private key is held in a DigiCert HSM. It never appears in source control, CI/CD pipelines, or any runtime environment.
  • Code signing is performed by a dedicated Azure DevOps signing pipeline (identity-mri-signing.yml) with strict access control.
  • Per-startup random signing keys are used in development. Production keys must be provisioned from HashiCorp Vault — hardcoded keys are blocked at CI.
  • Vault-backed secret management means no credentials are ever stored in configuration files or environment variables in production.

Cryptographic manifest verification

Capability manifest structure

  • Every module declares: capabilityId, tierAvailability, signatureRef, dependencies, policyHooks, and evidenceOutputs.
  • Manifests are validated at runtime before any module is allowed to initialise.
  • If a manifest is missing, invalid, expired, or its hash does not match the signed descriptor, the system drops to MRI-only mode and logs a security event.
  • No configuration-only mechanism can elevate a licence tier. Tier elevation requires a new signed manifest.

Forbidden bypass patterns

  • There are no environment-variable bypass flags. DEBUG_SKIP_LICENCE or equivalent is not a feature of IdentityFirst.
  • Unsigned capability activation (signed=False equivalent) is not possible. The activation path always requires a valid signature.
  • Config-based tier elevation (config["tier"] = "aisf" equivalent) is not possible. Tier is determined solely by the signed manifest.
  • These constraints are enforced by automated guardrail tests that run on every pull request and block merge on failure.

Tamper-evident audit chain

Every action, every approval, every capability activation generates an HMAC-SHA256 chained audit record in an append-only PostgreSQL store. This is not WORM-immutable storage; blob-backed immutability is on the roadmap.

HMAC-chained immutability

  • Every audit record includes an HMAC-SHA256 hash of the previous record, forming a chain designed to reveal undetected alteration.
  • Audit records cannot be updated or deleted via any API surface. The store is append-only.
  • Null or blank actor values cause the write to be rejected at the service layer — no anonymous actions are permitted.
  • PostgreSQL append-only audit store backs production persistence. All entries are retained for a minimum of 7 years. WORM-immutable blob storage is planned but not yet shipping.

What is logged

  • Operator identity (authenticated subject from JWT Bearer claim).
  • Timestamp, correlation ID, and tenant identifier on every event.
  • Capability activation: capability ID, tier, signature verification result, module hash, policy decision.
  • Human approval decisions: operator identity, decision outcome, evidence reference, and policy result for every privileged action.

Formal evidentiary review support

  • The audit substrate supports structured export workflows where they are licensed and in contractual scope.
  • Structured JSON export is available for supported workflows such as DSAR responses, investigations, and other agreed review processes.
  • Minimum 7-year retention is enforced by policy and cannot be overridden by tenant configuration below that floor.
  • Stronger non-repudiation depends on the signed export path and verification workflow, not append-only storage alone.
  • Audit logs cannot be erased in response to a GDPR erasure request during the legal retention period — the legal basis is Art. 6(1)(c) (legal obligation).

Data residency options

Deployment mode Data location Customer control Notes
SaaS (EU region) IONOS Cloud (UK or EU region by contract) Region selected at contract Data never leaves the contracted region. Sub-processors are documented in the DPA.
SaaS (UK region) IONOS Cloud (London) Region selected at contract UK-only residency for UK-regulated customers.
Connected On-Premises Customer-managed data centre Full customer control Platform deployed within customer infrastructure. IdentityFirst does not host data.
Air-Gapped Customer-managed, network-isolated environment Full customer control No outbound connectivity. Licence validation uses offline manifests signed by the EV certificate. Suitable for classified and high-security environments.

Penetration testing

Independent penetration testing is part of the 2026 security assurance programme. The first assessment has not yet completed; completed summaries will be shared under NDA once available.

Testing schedule

  • An external penetration test is scheduled in the 2026 assurance cycle. The first test has not yet completed.
  • Planned scope: SaaS API surface, authentication and authorisation controls, tenant isolation, connector endpoints, and admin interfaces.
  • Internal security reviews are performed continuously via automated SAST (Semgrep, Bandit), dependency scanning (Trivy, Dependabot), and secret scanning (Gitleaks) — this IS running today.
  • Planned SLA: critical findings will be remediated within 7 days, high within 30 days, with results tracked to closure.

Report availability

  • Executive summaries from completed penetration tests will be available to prospective and current customers under NDA once the first assessment has completed.
  • To request the first summary when available, email security@identityfirst.net with subject “Pen test report request”. Include your company name and the context (procurement, annual review, etc.).
  • Full reports (including raw findings) are not distributed. Summaries will include: scope, methodology, critical/high finding counts, and remediation status.
  • NDA must be executed before any summary is shared. Template NDA available on request.

Responsible disclosure policy

We take security reports seriously and commit to a transparent, good-faith response process.

How to report

  • Email security@identityfirst.net with a clear description of the vulnerability.
  • Include: affected component, steps to reproduce, potential impact assessment, and your contact details.
  • You may also open a GitHub Security Advisory for coordinated disclosure.
  • PGP encryption is available on request for sensitive reports. Request the public key at the security email above.

Response commitments

  • We request a 90-day coordinated disclosure window before public disclosure to allow remediation.
  • We do not take legal action against researchers acting in good faith.
  • We will acknowledge your contribution in release notes unless you prefer anonymity.
Severity Initial response Resolution target
Critical 24 hours 7 days
High 72 hours 30 days
Medium / Low 7 days 90 days
Security contact

Vulnerability reports, security questionnaires, vendor due diligence, pen test report requests.

GitHub Security Advisories

Preferred channel for coordinated disclosure on specific code vulnerabilities.

Back to Trust Centre

Certifications, DPA, sub-processor list, GDPR details.